Boring and gutless, same as all of the 150-180 VAG 20VT's IMO. Suppose it depends what you're used to, but if you'd like a bit of a thrill then I wouldn't bother.
A good all round car but not an exciting car to drive.
I've taken a liking to the above.
I've had a golf 1999 1.6 before, but I hated it.
What's everyone's opinion on them, has anyone been in one?
Pros and cons between the 150 & 180 models?
Boring and gutless, same as all of the 150-180 VAG 20VT's IMO. Suppose it depends what you're used to, but if you'd like a bit of a thrill then I wouldn't bother.
A good all round car but not an exciting car to drive.
Boring when standard, but so easy to modify for good powerfigures.!
I have had a seat Ibiza cupra 20vt went well like anything if you put money into them they go really well ko4 turbo s3 injectors maf ect good for 260+ easy depending on the year you buy they come with ko3 or ko3s but all 150 come with ko3
Last edited by mjjgt; 8th September 2012 at 21:26.
Yawn-fest. Might as well go for the gt tdi and at least have good economy.
I'm assuming it's the same story with the s3?
They are alright ben, not much fun really. The one i had was 200bhp and i would rather of had a standard gt to be honest. Dual mass flywheels is a weak point if you start tunning. recaro interiors wear easy. other than that they are pretty easy cars to own just to very thrilling.