http://www.streetfire.net/video/civi...tr_2231184.htm
Civic 1.8litre B18C6 NA, 13.667 167.7km/h
PGT 1.4litre 176B6.000 turbo, 13.774 167.9km/h
60feet was 0.2sec better for the Civic (LSD)
not being funny but wen i went pod last.. there was a green pug 205 with a gti-6 conversion running 300bhp... and he could only just hit low high 12s low 13s
http://www.streetfire.net/video/civi...tr_2231184.htm
Civic 1.8litre B18C6 NA, 13.667 167.7km/h
PGT 1.4litre 176B6.000 turbo, 13.774 167.9km/h
60feet was 0.2sec better for the Civic (LSD)
Yer sorry realised that after I posted. But still never in the 12s
My mates oldskool mini had a teg type r lump running 210bhp and best he managed was 13.5 1/4.
You need serious power to get a FWD car in the 12s
Great vids, seroiusly owned that CTR
Well there you go then! Your comparing 300+ bhp doing a 12.8 and 230-250bhp doing a 13.5! So how is that rubbish?
You came on here, and the way you implied was talking similar spec engine to this but in a astra doing a 12s. It's like comparing a stock GT to a 2ltr GT. The power is completely different!
My 2ltr did a 13.0 on normal road tyres, full leather, cage, and a boot full to brim with tools, trolley jack, axle stands and general crap. 330bhp 327lbft. Is that ****?
Nice 2l with good times.....
I was stood by the start line at Pod not long back and a E46 M3 running 750 parked up!
My penis grew 1/4 mile in under 13s
Wouldnt give me a time slip though..
who on god greens earth goes to a RWYB and pays money to go up the strip with a boot full of axle stands, trolley jack etc.? tools as well and then hopes to get the best time possible. come off it. youd need every one of your 330 horses.
i mean who?