Haha "every twat has an M3" that is so true! Was discussing it the other day, saw over a dozen and 2 nearly in accidents from been driven like a spaz.
M3 anyday !
Haha "every twat has an M3" that is so true! Was discussing it the other day, saw over a dozen and 2 nearly in accidents from been driven like a spaz.
It was c*nt actually
1997 Fiat Punto GT Abarth - being restored
2014 Jaguar XFR-S Sportbrake
****ing wankers, the list goes on lol. Saw one rag top with the most awful blue leather... looked like a bad 3-piece form 1976!
He ment im a **** ! cheers chris , **** !
What you on about?
1997 Fiat Punto GT Abarth - being restored
2014 Jaguar XFR-S Sportbrake
The fish swam by, ignored the bait and went straight to the fisherman.
I call this thread; 'The Satirical Verses' by Salmon Rushdie.
Twitter: @ImJamesHans
Got the wrong end of that then lol ! Im just gonna shut up now
How about price?Originally Posted by Debo
Yeah, ok then.
But comparing standard to modified is a bit retarded isn't it?
Minimaniac's 2.0 is faster than a new shape M3, but I know which one I'd rather have sat on my driveway. Charge the M3 and there's instantly no comparison.
Ok, well how about comparing cars from the same market sector..
i.e a GT is only a warm hatch, a CTR is a hot hatch - which is one of the many reasons why they cost more. The only fair way to compare cars, is standard vs standard, from the same market section, and new vs new.
£12,500 for a new GT back in 1994 - warm hatch - 60 in 7.9 and 100 in 22.5?
£16,500 for a new (basic) CTR in 2001 - hot hatch - 62 in 6.4 and 100 in 16.5
A natural competitor to a GT is the Saxo VTS, which has almost identical figures, and is from the same era.
If you have any car care related questions, ask me in the Cleaning/Detailing section.
Posting Permissions
