2.4 16v turbo stroker engine

[Tom]

why?

You can get 450bhp out of a 2l.

[cragterharris]

Only problem is they are 5cyl lumps and iirc you gotta chop the chassis leg to fit it

[Todd]

No you don't......

[Acki]

The enine isn't durable with stock displacement.

[cragterharris]

So how come not many people have fitted the 20vt lumps then!

[Todd]

I know someone with a 20vt fitted to a mk1, and he claims he never had to cut the chassis leg away.

[Yelfig]

too much torque for mk1 chassis that will only result to more spin...
2.0 is ok but for even better you can make it 1.9 if you don't like the way it works (coupe engines are a bit 'slow' to rev)..

[shorty]

I know someone with a 20vt fitted to a mk1, and he claims he never had to cut the chassis leg away.

Mk1 puntos don't need the chassis legs cutting, as you make mounts to take the engine like Paul has on his 16vt and the one I have.

Mk2 puntos need the chassis legs cutting, because the standard mounting points are in a totally different place.

[cragterharris]

Ah that might of been what I was thinking of

[giancarlokarter]

I just made sandwich plates for my 16vt conversion as I suppose you would with the 20vt